As the US government shutdown drags on, Donald Trump has demanded that Senate Republicans “play their TRUMP CARD” and get rid of the filibuster . But what exactly is this rule, why does it matter, and can a president really make it vanish?
The Story In a late-night Truth Social post, President Donald Trump urged Senate Republicans to “end the filibuster,” the rule requiring 60 votes to pass most legislation , to break the deadlock over government funding.
Republicans currently control 53 of the 100 Senate seats, short of the 60 needed to overcome Democratic opposition. Trump’s demand revives a long-running Washington debate about whether the Senate’s tradition of extended debate protects democracy or paralyses it.
The Big Picture
The filibuster is a procedural rule unique to the US Senate that allows a minority of senators to delay or block a bill by continuing debate indefinitely. To end debate and move to a final vote, the Senate must invoke “cloture”, which needs three-fifths of the chamber, or 60 votes.
Originally meant to protect the rights of the minority, the filibuster has become a tool of partisan gridlock. Today, senators rarely hold the floor for hours as in the past; simply threatening to filibuster is enough to stall legislation.
As a result, most major bills need bipartisan support to pass. Only budget reconciliation bills, which deal with taxes or spending, can bypass the filibuster and pass with a simple majority.
Driving the News
Facing a shutdown that has frozen federal programs and threatened health-care subsidies, Trump called on Republicans to “play their TRUMP CARD” and eliminate the filibuster entirely.
The president’s message came after Senate Democrats blocked a funding bill, demanding the reinstatement of certain health-insurance subsidies linked to the Affordable Care Act. Republican leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, have so far resisted calls to change the rule, saying the White House has not formally pressed them to do so.
This is not Trump’s first clash with the filibuster. During his first term he also demanded its removal to speed up legislation, but Senate Republicans then, as now, declined to take that step.
Why It Matters
Getting rid of the filibuster would reshape the Senate and the balance of power in Washington.
Short-term effect: Republicans could pass spending bills and other legislation with 51 votes, ending the shutdown without Democratic support.
Long-term risk: Once the rule is gone, Democrats could use the same simple-majority standard if they regain control, advancing sweeping policies opposed by conservatives.
That is why many senators, including traditionalists in both parties, are wary of what is known as the “nuclear option.” They fear it would destroy the Senate’s character as a deliberative body designed to slow down the legislative process and force consensus.
Can Trump Actually Do It?
No. The president cannot unilaterally change Senate rules.
Under the US Constitution, each chamber of Congress sets its own rules. The only way to eliminate or weaken the filibuster is for a majority of senators to vote for a rule change or to create a new procedural precedent, often referred to as the “nuclear option.”
This has been used before:
But those moves applied only to appointments, not legislation. Extending the “nuclear option” to all bills would be a much bigger and more controversial step.
Given the current numbers, Republicans would need at least 51 votes to make that change. Several GOP senators, including moderates, have expressed opposition, meaning Trump’s call may remain symbolic unless the party unites behind him.
What’s Next
Unless the rule changes, the 60-vote threshold remains in place, forcing both sides to negotiate a funding compromise to reopen the government.
If Republican leaders sense growing political damage from the shutdown, pressure may mount to test the “nuclear option.” But doing so could permanently alter how the Senate works and change how every future president, Democrat or Republican, governs.
For now, the filibuster stands: part guardrail, part chokehold, and a reminder that in Washington, breaking the rules is always easier to say than to do.
The Story In a late-night Truth Social post, President Donald Trump urged Senate Republicans to “end the filibuster,” the rule requiring 60 votes to pass most legislation , to break the deadlock over government funding.
Republicans currently control 53 of the 100 Senate seats, short of the 60 needed to overcome Democratic opposition. Trump’s demand revives a long-running Washington debate about whether the Senate’s tradition of extended debate protects democracy or paralyses it.
The Big Picture
The filibuster is a procedural rule unique to the US Senate that allows a minority of senators to delay or block a bill by continuing debate indefinitely. To end debate and move to a final vote, the Senate must invoke “cloture”, which needs three-fifths of the chamber, or 60 votes.
Originally meant to protect the rights of the minority, the filibuster has become a tool of partisan gridlock. Today, senators rarely hold the floor for hours as in the past; simply threatening to filibuster is enough to stall legislation.
As a result, most major bills need bipartisan support to pass. Only budget reconciliation bills, which deal with taxes or spending, can bypass the filibuster and pass with a simple majority.
Driving the News
Facing a shutdown that has frozen federal programs and threatened health-care subsidies, Trump called on Republicans to “play their TRUMP CARD” and eliminate the filibuster entirely.
The president’s message came after Senate Democrats blocked a funding bill, demanding the reinstatement of certain health-insurance subsidies linked to the Affordable Care Act. Republican leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, have so far resisted calls to change the rule, saying the White House has not formally pressed them to do so.
This is not Trump’s first clash with the filibuster. During his first term he also demanded its removal to speed up legislation, but Senate Republicans then, as now, declined to take that step.
Why It Matters
Getting rid of the filibuster would reshape the Senate and the balance of power in Washington.
Short-term effect: Republicans could pass spending bills and other legislation with 51 votes, ending the shutdown without Democratic support.
Long-term risk: Once the rule is gone, Democrats could use the same simple-majority standard if they regain control, advancing sweeping policies opposed by conservatives.
That is why many senators, including traditionalists in both parties, are wary of what is known as the “nuclear option.” They fear it would destroy the Senate’s character as a deliberative body designed to slow down the legislative process and force consensus.
Can Trump Actually Do It?
No. The president cannot unilaterally change Senate rules.
Under the US Constitution, each chamber of Congress sets its own rules. The only way to eliminate or weaken the filibuster is for a majority of senators to vote for a rule change or to create a new procedural precedent, often referred to as the “nuclear option.”
This has been used before:
- In 2013, Democrats led by Harry Reid scrapped the filibuster for most executive-branch nominees.
- In 2017, Republicans under Mitch McConnell extended that change to Supreme Court nominations.
But those moves applied only to appointments, not legislation. Extending the “nuclear option” to all bills would be a much bigger and more controversial step.
Given the current numbers, Republicans would need at least 51 votes to make that change. Several GOP senators, including moderates, have expressed opposition, meaning Trump’s call may remain symbolic unless the party unites behind him.
What’s Next
Unless the rule changes, the 60-vote threshold remains in place, forcing both sides to negotiate a funding compromise to reopen the government.
If Republican leaders sense growing political damage from the shutdown, pressure may mount to test the “nuclear option.” But doing so could permanently alter how the Senate works and change how every future president, Democrat or Republican, governs.
For now, the filibuster stands: part guardrail, part chokehold, and a reminder that in Washington, breaking the rules is always easier to say than to do.
You may also like
'Babies are starving!': Kamala Harris explodes over Donald Trump's $300 million ballroom — watch
HIGNFY interrupted for breaking Andrew Mountbatten news as Jason Manford halts show
BRS, BJP have 'fevicol bond': Telangana CM Reddy
Jagaddhatri Puja celebrated with devotion at Ramakrishna Mission in Agartala
A major setback amid the rupee's decline! Foreign exchange reserves have plummeted. Find out the reason.
