Ranveer Allahbadia had found himself into trouble due to his comments on Samay Raina's show 'India's Got Latent'. Several FIRs were filed against him and other influencers Apoorva Makhija, Ashish Chanchlani as well. Ranveer's passport was confiscated during a Supreme Court hearing over the comments on the show. The action had already stopped him from making international travel.
Now the court has granted him a big relief and directed to release his passport, which also further allows him to travel internationally. Justices Surya Kant and NK Singh instructed the Nodal Cyber Police to return Ranveer's passport. However, the condition for the same would be that the Youtuber is available for quetioning whenever he is needed, during the investigation.
On February 18, the court had put a stay on his arrest, but barred him from doing any shows. He was also told to not leave the country without permission. Later, on March 3, the court allowed him to continue with his show.
Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, remarked that while Allahbadia’s show is not vulgar, it is “perverse.” He distinguished between humor, vulgarity, and perversity, suggesting that regulatory measures might be necessary to prevent content violating societal moral standards. The court asked the SG to explore potential regulations that would uphold free speech under Article 19(4) while ensuring content remains within acceptable boundaries.
Now the court has granted him a big relief and directed to release his passport, which also further allows him to travel internationally. Justices Surya Kant and NK Singh instructed the Nodal Cyber Police to return Ranveer's passport. However, the condition for the same would be that the Youtuber is available for quetioning whenever he is needed, during the investigation.
On February 18, the court had put a stay on his arrest, but barred him from doing any shows. He was also told to not leave the country without permission. Later, on March 3, the court allowed him to continue with his show.
Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, remarked that while Allahbadia’s show is not vulgar, it is “perverse.” He distinguished between humor, vulgarity, and perversity, suggesting that regulatory measures might be necessary to prevent content violating societal moral standards. The court asked the SG to explore potential regulations that would uphold free speech under Article 19(4) while ensuring content remains within acceptable boundaries.
You may also like
Somnath encroachment case: SC asks Gujarat govt to keep wall height at 5-6 ft
Strictly's John Whaite hits out at Waitrose as he hints OnlyFans has affected career
IPO-Bound Meesho Renames Parent Company To Align Corporate & Brand Identity
Inside Vaibhav Suryavanshi age row as 14-year-old cricket star makes IPL history
India-born Democrat Rep Shri Thanedar brings impeachment articles against Trump, says 'enough is enough'